Philosophy and Ethics in Public Health

There are many definitions of public health, but the simplest is that public health is the constellation of actions that a society takes to enable people to enjoy good health and remain free of disease.

The goal of achieving a healthy society is intrinsically good, since it reduces disease, suffering and enables people to live longer, happier lives. These benefits have tangible benefits such as greater productivity and reduced spending on medical care.

While these goals are unarguably good, there is still debate as to how much money should be directed to public health when there is competition for limited resources, or whether the cost of a particular public health intervention justify the benefits.

Other considerations:

• What freedoms may be in conflict with the intervention?
• Do the benefits of interventions outweigh the potential for unknown risks?

Public health ethics involves the principals that guide us as a society in making decisions about public health that conform to our morals and standards while resolving or minimizing conflicts.

Learning Objectives:

1. Discuss the philosophical justifications for public health
2. Discuss the moral considerations for public health
3. Discuss the justifications for overriding interests such as freedom of action privacy and confidentiality in order to achieve public health goals
4. Explain the key questions that should be addressed when analyzing an ethical issue in public health
5. Define the "police power" and discuss the major precedents set by Jacobson v. Massachusetts

Philosophical Justification

Several theories had significant impact on shaping public health ethics.

Jeremy Bentham was a proponent of utilitarianism, evaluating actions based on their consequences in producing happiness and contributing toward the greater good. His philosophy was "the greatest good for the greatest number".

John Stuart mills was also a utilitarian but refined his views to distinguish higher and lower pleasures. "The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others." He was not absolute on this, as he acknowledged that no system of ethics requires the sole motive of all we do be based on duty. 99% of all our actions are done from other motives, and rightfully so if the rule of duty does not condemn them.

"Public Health draws its foundational legitimacy from the essential and direct role that health plays in human flourishing... However, the general justification is sometimes too broad to provide sufficient moral warrant for specific public health policies which are implemented by the state and affect the liberty or privacy or corporate or individual persons."

 -JS

Overall Benefit

All individual population members benefit from public health agencies and interventions, even if they don't benefit from all interventions. Agencies such as the CDC and FDA are charged with improving health within the population. While public health regulations may pose restrictions and inconvenience to some of us, the overall effect is an improvement in the quality of our lives.

Collective Action and Efficiency

Public health operates at the population level, and many of its benefits could not be achieved without regulation and coordinated efforts of many trained people with special expertise. For example, food safety at the level we currently enjoy could not be achieved without extensive, coordinated effort by many agencies.

Fairness in the Distributions of Burdens

A basic premise is that burdens and benefits should be distributed fairly. For example the requirement for childhood vaccinations encourage high levels of population immunity and provides a distribution of both the benefit of protection and the burden of having to get vaccinations.